Monday, July 30, 2012

Working like a peon...

Sorry for the lacking of post for the pass few days.

As the title says it, I have been working like a peon and swamped with boring task which I wish I could avoid but am sadly not able to...

Anyhow, I shall try my best to post something new latest by end of the week (which I am keeping my fingers crossed that all the crappy task which actually isn't my work to begin with, will be done with).

I am really starting to look like this chap...



Wednesday, July 25, 2012

They forget to tell us something...



Here is an awesome read about the things that life just doesn't tell you until you take it to the face.




Courtesy of Link

Saturday, July 21, 2012

Torchlight 2 delayed but still to release by Summer 2012.

* Updated (23 July) 
Here is more sexy reasons why they are taking a tad longer to polish the game :



So much awesomeness heading our way and only for a mere USD20.00.

TAKE MY MONEY!!! TAKE IT NOW!!!





So it seems that this highly anticipated game (for me at least cause Failablo3 was so fail, duh!), will be delayed and released sometime later in the year. Their main reason for delay after the beta is due to balancing issues, touch up of contents and generally making the game more awesome!

A complete response from Runic themselves, can be found below :

LINK 


Thankfully, they are still scheduled to release this sexy game sometime later in Summer 2012 (initial plan and speculations were early Summer, slightly after Failablo3 release).




The DPS, Crits, etc is just mad on Berserker...


Since the Beta 2 months back, I am still playing my overpowered (OP) Berserker from time to time when I got nothing to do cause nothing there is nothing quite like slaying groups of trash mobs, uniques and bosses for some sexy loot.

But I can understand the extra time needed to balance as Berserker to me is totally OP when I can kill the Act 1 boss in just a few seconds due to mega crit + execution, in the highest difficulty. Sadly, none of the other classes I tried with good gear, could achieve anything near.

I rather wait for a well polished game then play something broken that would require constant patching like a certain Blizzard game recently released, Dia.. ahem... blo... three...


... and here is a picture of Nicholas Cage.






Source1, Source2

Tuesday, July 17, 2012

"Siri, call me maybe." Yes, Maybe...

I have never really tried using Siri before but I always get a good laugh watching my friends attempting to communicate with Skynet... I mean Siri.



Just a short one with some stats about Siri and its users.

Click to Enlarge








Source1

Friday, July 13, 2012

So many Movies, so little time...




Just a short post about the latest buzz on Comic related movies and some upcoming movies based on famous game titles.


Latest updates about more Marvel movie heading our way:
  • The Wolverine  -  2013
  • Superman: Man of Steel (reboot)  -  2013
  • The Amazing Spider 2  -  2014
  • X-Men: First Class 2  -  2014
  • Guardians of the Galaxy  -  2014 

Unconfirmed release dates (but might already have directors/producers/writers)
  • Fantastic Four (possible reboot)
  • Venom (Spider Man's villain)
  • Ant Man (might not end up as a movie on it's own)
  • The Flash
  • Green Lantern 2

Some unconfirmed comic book titles that will be made into big screen movies:
  • Doctor Strange
  • Silver Surfer


And lastly, some movies that are in the making, which are based on PC or Console games:
  • Assassin's Creed
  • Splinter Cell
  • Shadow of the Colossus
  • God of War
  • Deus Ex


At the end of the day, I am still hoping for a Marvel vs. DC movie...






Thursday, July 12, 2012

Sale & Discounts are all a lie?!?!



" 70% Discount Sale! "

" Best Bargain Buy! "

" Buy 2, FREE 1! "

This are just some of the strategies used to attract customers to shop at their outlets. 

What so bad about that since we (the shoppers) will be getting items at a discounted price?

Well, it isn't as simple as that but "they" want it to look just that simple and make us feel good when we shop and get the best bargains. There is a lot of science going on behind giving out a discounted sale to customers.

Generally, we (the shoppers) feel good when we manage to snag a good buy or deal such as buying something expensive for less or getting some more by paying less. This is what the large companies cash in on, by manipulating the shoppers mind.

So I found a great article by Derek Thompson of The Atlantic that writes about a number of ways consumer gets a quick one pulled over their eyes making them think they got a good deal, when in the end, the consumer ends up being the loser again.

A simple example that he describes is about 2 offers:
  • A $1 cup of 300ml Coffee with 33% more (making it 400ml), or
  • A $1 cup of 300ml Coffee with 33% discount (making it $0.67)

The discounts / offer above seems similar, 33% more or 33% cheaper. But that is not the full picture. With a simple breakdown, at $1 for 300ml ($0.33 per 100ml),
  • The first deal yields 400ml for $1 ($0.25 per 100ml)
  • While the second deal yields 300ml for only $1 ($0.22 per 100ml)
This trick basically plays to trick buyers as buyers generally feel better when they get something more when paying the same price instead of paying less for the same.

With the above in mind, notice how discounts, bargains and sale seem to love giving more for the same price rather then giving the same amount for less? Evil businessmen...

Anyway, it is a very interesting article to read up on since it is sale time all over the country and would hurt to equip yourself with some of the tricks that "they" employ to make away with our hard earned cash. Below is the original article courtesy of The Atlantic.

Here are 10 more ways consumers are bad at math, with an assist from historian and author William Poundstone.


(2) We're heavily influenced by the first number.

 You walk into a high-end store, let's say it's Hermès, and you see a $7,000 bag. "Haha, that's so stupid!" you tell your friend. "Seven grand for a bag!" Then you spot an awesome watch for $367. Compared to a Timex, that's wildly over-expensive. But compared to the $7,000 price tag you just put to memory, it's a steal. In this way, stores can massage or "anchor" your expectations for spending.


(3) We're terrified of extremes. 

We don't like feeling cheap, and we don't like feeling duped. Since we're not sure what things are worth, we shy away from prices that appear too high or too low. Stores can employ our bias for moderation against us. Here's a great story: 

People were offered 2 kinds of beer: premium beer for $2.50 and bargain beer for $1.80. Around 80% chose the more expensive beer. Now a third beer was introduced, a super bargain beer for $1.60 in addition to the previous two. Now 80% bought the $1.80 beer and the rest $2.50 beer. Nobody bought the cheapest option.
Third time around, they removed the $1.60 beer and replaced with a super premium $3.40 beer. Most people chose the $2.50 beer, a small number $1.80 beer and around 10% opted for the most expensive $3.40 beer.

In short: We are all Goldilocks.


(4) We're in love with stories. 

In his book Priceless, William Poundstone explains what happened when Williams-Sonoma added a $429 breadmaker next to their $279 model: Sales of the cheaper model doubled even though practically nobody bought the $429 machine. Lesson: If you can't sell a product, try putting something nearly identical, but twice as expensive, next to it. It'll make the first product look like a gotta-have-it bargain. One explanation for why this tactic works is that people like stories or justifications. Since it's terribly hard to know the true value of things, we need narratives to explain our decisions to ourselves. Price differences give us a story and a motive: The $279 breadmaker was, like, 40 percent cheaper than the other model -- we got a great deal! Good story.


(5) We do what we're told. 

Behavioral economists love experimenting in schools, where they've found that shining a light on fruit and placing a salad bar in the way of the candy makes kids eat more fruit and salad. But adults are equally susceptible to these simple games. Savvy restaurants, for example, design their menus to draw our eyes to the most profitable items by things as simple as pictures and boxes. Good rule of thumb: If you see a course on the menu that's highlighted, boxed, illustrated, or paired with a really expensive item, it's probably a high-margin product that the restaurant hopes you'll see and consider. 


(6) We let our emotions get the best of us. 

In a brilliant experiment from Poundstone's book, volunteers are offered a certain number of dollars out of $10. Offers seen as "unfair" ($1, let's say) activated the insula cortex, "which is otherwise triggered by pain and foul odors." When we feel like we're being ripped off, we literally feel disgusted -- even when it's a good deal. Poundstone equates this to the minibar experience. It's late, you're hungry, there's a Snickers right there, but you're so turned off by the price, that you starve yourself to avoid the feeling of being ripped off. The flip-side is that bargains literally make us feel good about ourselves. Even the most useless junk in the world is appealing if the price feels like a steal.


(7) We're easily made dumber by alcohol, time, decisions. 

When you're young and drunk at a bar, you're more likely to do stupid things with strangers. "Am I fully assessing this complex romantic situation?" is a difficult question to answer on seven glasses of wine, so we're more likely to ask ourselves a simpler question: "Is s/he hot?" When we're drunk, stressed, tired, and otherwise inattentive, we're more likely to ask and answer simple questions about buying things. Cheap candy bars and gum are situated near the check-out at grocery stores because that's where exhausted shoppers are most likely to indulge cravings without paying attention to price. Boozy lunches are good for deal-making because alcohol narrows the range of complicating factors we can hold in our heads at once. If you want somebody to take an under-examined risk, get him boozed, tired, or ego-depleted.


(8) We're pained by transaction costs... 

In a personal finance column here, Megan McArdle implored her readers to give up recurring payments like gym memberships and subscriptions to papers and services they don't use. "Don't buy stuff you don't consume" seems like obvious enough advice, but Megan had a great point. We're drawn to subscriptions and memberships and bundles partially because we seek to avoid transaction costs. We'd rather overpay a little than suffer the psychological pain of pulling out a wallet and watching our money go to each gym season/movie/etc.


(9) ... but we're weird about rebates and warranties. 

Now that I've just told you that consumers try to avoid additional payments, I should add that there are two additional payments we love: rebates and warranties. The first buys the illusion of wealth ("I'm being paid money to spend money!"). The second buys peace of mind ("Now I can own this thing forever without worrying about it!"). Both are basically tricks. "Instead of buying something and getting a rebate," Poundstone writes, "why not just pay a lower price in the first place?' 
"[Warranties] make no rational sense," Harvard economist David Cutler told the Washington Post. "The implied probability that [a product] will break has to be substantially greater than the risk that you can't afford to fix it or replace it. If you're buying a $400 item, for the overwhelming number of consumers that level of spending is not a risk you need to insure under any circumstances."


(10) We're obsessed with the number 9. 

Up to 65 percent of all retail prices end in the number 9. Why? Everybody knows that $20 and $19.99 are the same thing. But the number 9 tells us something simple: This thing is discounted. This thing is cheap. This thing was priced by somebody who knows you like things discounted and cheap. In other words, 9 has transcended the status of charm price to become a cable of silent understanding between buyer and seller that a product is being priced competitively and fairly. Putting a 9 on a shell-fish platter at a high-end restaurant is ridiculous. Nobody spending $170 on lobster is looking for a discount. But the same person shopping for underwear is (research has shown, again and again) more likely to buy a product that ends in 9. Remember: Shopping is an attention game. Consumers aren't just hunting for products. They're hunting for clues that products are worth buying. In the number 9, the bargain-hunter/discount-gatherer corner of our brain spots a pluckable deal.


(11) We're compelled by a strong sense of fairness. 

I've already explained how our brains light up differently based on seeing a bargain vs. a rip-off. The shopper's brain is motivated by a sense of fairness. Again, it comes back to the idea that we don't know what things should cost, and so we use cues to tell us what we ought to pay for them. An experiment by the economist Dan Ariely tells the story beautifully. Ariely pretended he was giving a poetry recital. He told one group of students that the tickets cost money and another group that they would be paid to attend. Then he revealed to both groups that the recital was free. The first group was anxious to attend, believing they were getting something of value for free. The second group mostly declined, believing they were being forced to volunteer for the same event without compensation. 




Well then, Happy Shopping!




Wednesday, July 11, 2012

I had a THORific day at work.

It seems I was too bored sitting in meetings the whole day, so I decided to make some THOR memes since there is so many of it going around the Internet. Kinda enjoyed making them, will see if I can come up with more :)








I think I have more meetings coming up in the next couple of days, time for more thormenting.



Monday, July 9, 2012

Marvel has plenty more movies lined up.


If you though the recent THE AVENGERS movie was good, Marvel has plenty more installed for us comic book fan boys and superhero lovers.

Marvel is anything but done with bringing our favorite childhood superhero to the cinema screens. With so many characters, teams and villains to choose from, it is anyone's guess what we will be getting next.

So the latest confirmation on some Marvel films:


  • IRON MAN 3   -   3 May 2013
  • THOR 2   -   8 November 2013
  • CAPTAIN AMERICA 2   -   2 April 2014
  • GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY    -  1 August 2014
  • THE AVENGERS 2   -   Sometime in 2015


Well, that is just the tip of the iceberg it seems as Marvel has more up it sleeve:

* May contain spoilers, read at your own risk, but if you are a bad enough fan, it wouldn't matter.





  • Ant Man - is in the pipeworks and should eventually end up in of the movies above or possibly even a movie on its own before The Avengers 2.
  • Black Panther - has been confirmed to be a hoax and not in production (but we never know right? haha...)


    • A movie of its own as it has an group of characters and storyline.
      • Adam Warlock, Rocket Raccoon, Drax, etc.
    • Will tie in with The Avengers (in The Avengers 2 or 3?)
    • Will work together with The Avengers to deal with Thanos (Thanos is the bad-ass revealed in the after credits of The Avengers 2012)


  • Additional things you will want to read up on to get more info about this:

** Click to jump to link



With such a good run with The Avengers 2012, they will have plenty of budget and more experience in handling Marvel movies on a larger scale. Lets hope everything works out and we get to watch all this awesomeness in the next couple of years.


And here is a new photo from the upcoming RIDDICK movie




Source1, Source2

Sunday, July 8, 2012

Nexus 7 Tablet: Mega Value for your money



Along with the revealing of Android 4.1 Jelly Bean, there was loads of other goodies that Google took time to share and discuss with its developers and users.

One of them that should not be missed is the unveiling of an awesome tablet, Google Nexus 7 Tablet.


This is one monster of a tablet for a fraction of the price you would have to pay for other tablets near similar specs. Not only that, this bad puppy will also run on 4.1 Jelly Bean, fully taking advantage of the latest updates.

All you have to pay for this great piece of technology is:

  • USD199 for 8GB (internal storage) version
  • USD 249 for 16GB  (internal storage) version

That would be like 700-800 Ringgit only! Take my money now!!!

Just try comparing this to the local tablet which a local maker is trying to sell for 999 Ringgit known as 1Malaysia Pad (click to view specs)


Here is a quick rundown on the specs for Google Nexus 7 Tablet:

  • 7 inch IPS display - 1280 x 800 pixels
  • 1.3GHz quad-core Tegra 3
  • 1GB Ram
  • 12 core ultra-low voltage Nvidia GeForce GPU
  • 8GB or 16GB internal storage
  • WiFi, Bluetooth & NFC (Google Wallet enabled)
  • No 3G model (yet, probably in the near future)
  • Front facing 1.2MP camera
  • No rear camera :(
  • Dimensions: 198.5 x 120 x 10.5 mm
  • Weigh - 340 grams
  • Battery - 4325 mAh 

How can someone not love all that sexiness squeezed into a 7 inch tablet for a couple of hundred bucks?

Promo video for the tablet: